Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Muybridge or Daguerreotype or Something


Shot by Stylist Shannon Amos with an iphone at our shoot yesterday in Fairfield, CA

4 comments:

Charles Klein said...

...?

Sorry but I don't see what you mean there...

Timothy Archibald said...

hi charles-
oh...i dunno. i thought the blurry b&w series looked like something the referenced early photographic processes. maybe i'm so dumbed down by the digital i can't tell anymore...

bird. said...

But iphone is a capture device.... not a print, which is what any sort of "type" is, right? Even a wet plate colloidion neg, if printed w/ say, a platinum process (or a cyanotype, or a VanDyke or...) , would still be a platinotype. Could you call it a call it a collodionplatinotype? Would this be an iphonotype?

I don't know what the hell I'm saying. Is this even English?

chirp.

Charles Klein said...

iphonotype makes sense :-P

What are the specificities of phone photos?