tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2125625679268015136.post8996025886963640915..comments2024-03-20T00:20:43.671-07:00Comments on T.A.: Scientific American July 2010Timothy Archibaldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16098072127684110673noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2125625679268015136.post-32206843137794180082010-07-18T22:48:25.781-07:002010-07-18T22:48:25.781-07:00Hi Charley-
Yes...you are correct. We shot a bunch...Hi Charley-<br />Yes...you are correct. We shot a bunch of kids that day in the studio and were just taken by them- all of the expressions and emotions on the kids was just great. We had our editorial wants and needs, but then revisited the images to see if there was another direction we could take these kids to push it in the direction of our personal project "Babes In The Woods", which is just a bit more...atmospheric. <br /><br />Thanks for the kind words as well.<br /><br />TATimothy Archibaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16098072127684110673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2125625679268015136.post-5134844322748050082010-07-17T19:48:28.121-07:002010-07-17T19:48:28.121-07:00hi tim, just discovered your work and love it. i ...hi tim, just discovered your work and love it. i noticed that the baby in the spread above is the same as on your website (in 'new work') but with more of the 'babes in the woods" background. is that a composite you did after you shot the editorial?<br /><br />thanks. <br />also: love love love echolilia!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com